[Lazarus] Missing Documentation

[Hans-Peter Diettrich]

Michael Schnell schrieb:
> On 02/29/2012 12:37 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>> (of course nightly snapshots...
> Maybe automatic nightly snapshots fed into the svn might be more 
> workable for potential doc writers than being able to decently review 
> their work with the next "release", but anyway, splitting the help 
> proceedings in two completely different source trees seems rather 
> chaotic to me.

Again: please try to understand first, before writing nonsense :-(

As long as the IDE help is wiki-based, every user can edit the wiki, and 
he and all other users will see the changes immediately.

When this help is converted into FPDoc format, some day, the same 
procedure applies as to all XML-based documentation: every user has the 
files on his machine, and can update them locally. In the case of IDE 
help it may be required, then, to rebuild the local docs. This can be 
done for single HTML files almost instantly, while rebuilding entire CHM 
files requires more time, obviously.

DoDi