[Lazarus] Different "default" value for a property in derivedclass

[Hans-Peter Diettrich]

Jether (yahoo) schrieb:
> This doesn't make any sense to me, TB is descendent of TA, TB should 
> never affect the behavior of it's ancestror TA.

Properties are evaluated at compile time. When an object reference is 
known to be of type TB, the compiler uses the getter/setter methods of TB.

Nonetheless I don't understand what initialized properties in 
non-component classes are good for, together with the observed behaviour 
  of default values. Can somebody point me to the according documentation?

DoDi