[Lazarus] Buttons in frames
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk
Sat Feb 2 20:00:17 CET 2013
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:37:51 +0000
> Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>>> /usr/local/src/inifiles
>>>> /usr/local/src/inifiles/trunk
>>>>
>>>> /usr/local/src/heavywethers
>>>> /usr/local/src/heavywethers/trunk
>>>> /usr/local/src/heavywethers/inifiles -> /usr/local/src/inifiles
>>>>
>>>> with the project only referring to ../inifiles/trunk:
>>>>
>>>> <SearchPaths>
>>>> <IncludeFiles Value="$(ProjOutDir);$(LazarusDir)\ide"/>
>>>> <OtherUnitFiles Value="..\inifiles\trunk"/>
>>>> </SearchPaths>
>>> The relative path "../inifiles/trunk" is passed absolute to the
>>> compiler. If for example your project directory
>>> is /usr/local/src/heavywethers/trunk the IDE passes
>>> -Fu/usr/local/src/heavywethers/inifiles/trunk
>>> to the compiler.
>> Which presumably means that if there's an error the compiler reports the
>> absolute path, and the IDE doesn't realise that it's already got that
>> file open.
>
> 1. Why should the compiler report a wrong path?
That's not quite what I said. You pointed out that the IDE was
converting the relative path to an absolute one which is what the
compiler sees, the compiler reports an absolute path in any error
message, and by the time it sees that the IDE's forgotten that it's
already got the file open.
> 2. The files' inode may be the same, but for all other purposes they
> are two different files.
In the case of a symlink- arguable. But I think the case you've pointed
out is purely to do with the absolute/relative path to a file, and in
that case it's definitely the same file.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list