[Lazarus] Lazarus, Jedi etc.

Reinier Olislagers reinierolislagers at gmail.com
Wed Jul 17 11:17:29 CEST 2013

On 17/07/2013 11:03, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:49:48AM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> On 16/07/2013 18:18, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:23:10PM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>>> On 16-7-2013 11:53, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>>>>> Ranting from a position of ignorance seriously dilutes your credibility
>>>>> in my book.
>>>> I'm just saying the rants may be justified if mysql cannot be configured
>>>> to follow the RDBMS integrity norms.
>>>> Obviously you don't know if that is possible either, so let's give the
>>>> ranters the benefit of the doubt.
>>> Sigh, I thought I was clear on that.  Using Graeme's example:
>> So, QED: Mysql is not standards-compliant, the ranters have a point?
> WTF?  Graeme complained that the insert didn't fail in his example, I
> just showed that if you select the "traditional" sql mode, it does fail.
> As documented.  So the ranters don't have a point, since they can set
> the sql mode in the configuration of the server, or even per session (as
> many people already do).

Sorry, misread then.

However, you indicated the config can be fixed in this case. Doesn't
mean it can be fixed in all cases.

Regardless, I don't think prolonging this thread is very useful.


More information about the Lazarus mailing list