[Lazarus] Behavior of Lazarus windows CE seems to differ from the windows mobile behavior

["Arí Ricardo Ody"]

Windows 8 is used in tablets, notebooks and desktops. It has a great likeness to windows phone. Windows phone was create to substitutes operating systems that runs on handhelds and smartphones.

Windows Mobile and Windows CE was developed to run in handhelds and smartphones. There is a third operating system by MS named Pocket PC. Theoretically they are similar, but my experience shows me that Lazarus seems to run better under Windows Mobile 6 and later. I have a stable high reliable application for windows mobile hat have serious troubles to run under Windows CE and doesn't run in Pocket PC.

The Lazarus IDE is the same. You only must configure certain properties to generate executables to run in handhelds.

Hope I have give you some help

Ricardo
----- Original Message -----
From: Benito van der Zander
Sent: 07/29/13 04:23 PM
To: Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Behavior of Lazarus windows CE seems to differ from the windows mobile behavior

Interesting topic

What is the difference between Windows CE, Windows 8 and Windows Mobile?

Which one can you use Lazarus to create "apps" for? 

On 07/29/2013 06:07 PM, "Arí Ricardo Ody" wrote:Someone suggested compile with Lazarus 1.1. I did it(downloaded and installed daily screenshot). The trouble with fullscreen still exists. I discovered when I ran in a windows mobile device emulator. I'll ask for a friend try test in a WinCE device again. At least I'll discover if the new version manage the screens right in Windows CE(although the fullscreen still in trouble)

----- Original Message -----
From: Reinier Olislagers
Sent: 07/29/13 04:45 AM
To: Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Behavior of Lazarus windows CE seems to differ from the windows mobile behavior

On 28/07/2013 22:43, "Arí Ricardo Ody" wrote: > I'm using Lazarus 0.9.30 'cause the full screen routine is in trouble in > the versions 1.0.X and later. No experience with WinCE and Lazarus, but wasn't this problem fixed in Laz trunk? I at least recall a lot of posts about this a while ago... -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list  Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus 
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list  Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20130729/f46aa3f3/attachment-0003.html>