[Lazarus] WriteLn back to the GUI
listmember at letterboxes.org
Sat Oct 26 11:47:35 CEST 2013
On 2013-10-26 11:45, Sven Barth wrote:
> > If we could say that with enouh conjfidence, I'd gladly shift my
> focus to fcl-passrc.
> The main tests for what FPC supports and what not is for one compiling
> (or in this context at least "parsing") the compiler's source, the RTL
> and the packages. Additionally there are the tests which should either
> succeed or dail to compile/run (and when a new feature is added at
> least one test is added). So in my opinion the ability to correctly
> parse compiler, RTL and packages sources plus correctly parsing all
> tests that should compile and failing all tests that should fail would
> be enough in my opinion.
OK, then. I'll take a look at that one. Thanks.
> > Naturally <g> I know nothing about the importance of heap especially
> in this context or probbaly in any relevant context.
> > How hard would it be?
> As non-shared heap is the default, this would be no problem ^^
I am having difficulty interpreting '^^'.
What is it meant to mean?
More information about the Lazarus