[Lazarus] Lazarus/FPC for Web Development only

[silvioprog]

Copied from the link
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2014-February/085665.html:

Sure.

I didn't mean to say that it's not usable, just that at the time when
I looked for something
(some years ago), it was simply not yet available.

But, and please do not take this wrong, I would like to see some more
demos on your website:

At the moment, based on available examples, I simply don't see the
advantage of using brook
over plain fcl-web. If I look at the samples you currently provide, it
looks like a thin
layer on top of fcl-web, and fcl-db.

I am biased, obviously, but I think that a newbie also needs more
examples to see what brook
can do for him/her.

Michael.

-----

Yes yes. Currently, Brook can offer you an excellent way for you to route
your actions. Please, see this link:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/135304375/brookframework/doc/BrookAction.TBrookAction.html#Register

Now, Brook also offers facility for a user to manage simple things like
cookies, sessions, parameters in URLs (query_string) etc.

Recently, middleware has been implemented, so it is now possible to define
a rule in a constriant, and take it in multiple actions simultaneously
(veri nice for validations, in static forms, databases etc.).

There are several other news that would not show only in an email, for
example, ease of debugging, using the newest broker for embedded server,
created by Leledumbo.

It was necessary to remove some old files in the project, including some
demos because the final package was too large. But if someone wants to see
them again to have a base of old and new implementations, it is available
here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/135304375/brookframework/third-party.zip
.

-- 
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20140205/bdfb7e16/attachment-0003.html>