[Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?
Giuliano Colla
giuliano.colla at fastwebnet.it
Mon Jun 23 11:48:53 CEST 2014
Il 23/06/2014 10:56, Michael Schnell ha scritto:
> On 06/23/2014 10:48 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>> This is definitely one of your worst hijacking.
>
> Sorry this was not my intention (but just trying to be helpful). :-(
>
> Am I wrong understanding that this thread is about creating a new
> Widget Type (or something with a similar target) for Lazarus that does
> not use most of the Widgets the LCL provides (and hence a similar
> issue), even though the OP does not seem to know the term and the
> working of the LCL Widget Type setting ?
>
No, this is about creating new Widget Types which don't use *any* of the
widgets LCL provides.
In short, LCL philosophy is to have a High Level WS, (LCL) whose
implementation part is demanded to some third party Widgetset (such as
gtk, qt, Windows, etc.), via an Interfaces unit.
This is not compatible with other implementations, such as Kylix and
fgGui, just to mention two.
Giuliano
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list