[Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?
Michael Schnell
mschnell at lumino.de
Mon Jun 23 15:29:11 CEST 2014
On 06/23/2014 02:47 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> preferably with no extra dependencies like EpikTimer and no calibration.
I of course do see your point.
With my first test I just wanted to try to find the optimum (lowest
possible overhead, not arch depending) way to do it and came across
EpikTimer that obviously offers an example and found that EpikTimer
would benefit from finding a more manageable and more arch -
independent implementation.
That is why I did some research and looked whether vDSO might be a way
to go (which it is not for the time being.)
-Michael
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list