[Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?

[Graeme Geldenhuys]

On 2014-06-27 19:53, Giuliano Colla wrote:
> You need tons of workarounds to make them work under Lazarus, and to 
> comply with native widgesets features and bugs. Just to mention a few:


That is a very similar experience I had with LCL. My applications
required a lot of visual customisation, and LCL simply wasn't up to the
task. And like you said, things break often between versions. Also the
inconsistency between LCL widgetsets was a real nightmare.

CLX was definitely more consistent between Windows and Linux. I guess
LCL-Qt is probably the closest equivalent to CLX. But do people actually
use LCL-Qt under Windows?

Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/