[Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?

Michael Schnell mschnell at lumino.de
Mon Jun 30 11:36:41 CEST 2014


On 06/28/2014 12:51 AM, Giuliano Colla wrote:
> ...
Seems like you describe shortcomings in the LCL that are doubtlessly 
worse than it could be.

Hence the decent way of handling things would be to improve the LCL, 
rather than to try to do "normal-purpose" FPC based GUI enabled projects 
that avoid using the LCL.

-Michael




More information about the Lazarus mailing list