[Lazarus] Lazarus project compile flags

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com
Sat Jan 31 04:53:57 CET 2015


On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org
> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Toan Pham wrote:
>
>
>> Mattias,
>>
>>
>> Autotool, cmake and pkgconfig are tools for configuring and building
>> C/C++ projects.
>> The tools are very helpful because they allow the developers/software
>> builders to detect software dependencies, version requirements,
>> and also configure software features at build-time.  For example,
>> let's say we want to build gtk-2, we would do the following steps:
>>
>> 1.  Download the source code & unzip it
>> 2.  We want to configure it, without opengl support (just to illustrate
>> this example)
>>      ./configure --disable-opengl
>>
>> 3.  When we do this, auto-tool would call pkg-config (another utility),
>> and see if it has libcairo version 2.1 and freefont library
>> version 1.1 (for example).
>>
>> 4.  If the dependencies are satisfied, pkg-config also tells auto-tool
>> where to look for the libraries, by giving the CFLAGS and
>> LFLAGS
>>
>> in a nutshell, that's how it works.  At first, the process looks like
>> there is alot of work to build a package; but in practice;
>> its a standard way to build software, and it becomes very easier to
>> manage when one has to build a linux distribution.
>>
>> Object pascal and Lazarus projects are a little bit different.  I
>> normally build those projects manually with lazarus.  lazbuild is
>> nice, but it encapsulates many features from developers.  I understand
>> you can use -k option to pass options to the linker etc...  But
>> let say, you have 200+ pascal programs and libraries, how are you build
>> them effective?
>>
>>
>> You may think lazbuild is the solution; but let's say if you are a linux
>> distributor and you have to build 200+ projects and libraries
>> for different architectures, lazbuild may not be enough.
>>
>
> Why do you think so ?
>
> I have a fully automated build environment that uses lazbuild, guided by a
> custom written program and a shell script.
> It works transparantly on linux and windows. It results in an installer on
> both platforms: inno setup on windows, self-extracting shell script on
> linux, built from the same .iss file.
>
> This system compiles 40 interdependent packages/projects without human
> intervention; lazbuild takes care of the dependencies, paths and compiler
> options.
> Moreover, different versions of packages are handled without problems.
>
> I see no reason why it could not handle 200+ projects.
>
> Using the --pcp option I can even use different lazarus setups for daily
> builds and release builds.
>
> As far as I can see, Lazarus offers all you need. What do you think is
> missing ?
>
> Michael.
> --
>


Are these ( program sources and shell script ) open to public ?
If "Yes" , would you please supply link(s) to download ?

Thank you very much .

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20150130/a4a69b85/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Lazarus mailing list