[Lazarus] checksums for downloads

Marc Santhoff M.Santhoff at web.de
Sun Jul 19 15:29:10 CEST 2015


On So, 2015-07-19 at 14:18 +0100, Martin Frb wrote:
> On 19/07/2015 12:56, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since I have managed to destroy my fpc and/or lazarus installation and
> > have to install fresh ones, i wondered:
> >
> > Are there chechsums available anywhere for the needed downloads - fpc,
> > fpc sources, lazarus?
> >
> > I would feel mauch better, if so.
> >
> 
> I am not aware of them being separately published (except for the ones 
> on sourceforge, which are calculated by sourceforge).

I think it may be only little effort to publish those sums on the
website or put a file mdsums.txt aside wioth the downloads.

> As for the win installers, here are the checksums from the original 
> installers (the local copies I kept after the build).

Many thanks, but I'm using FreeBSD (8 and 9).


>                  MD5                             SHA-1
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------fc90c4a3f0e34fecec9026be5b7a96bf 
> 610f535bfd3c6ea1addcdf019d21fc2c14edadb1 
> 1.4.2\lazarus-1.4.2-fpc-2.6.4-cross-x86_64-win64-win32.exe 
> f177f00cbb16a87f044efc8cd7c90789 
> 77b0a6914a9b4b5416b4cb4d14e867cbfa89c635 
> 1.4.2\lazarus-1.4.2-fpc-2.6.4-win32.exe 28d8cd24dfb443ca48f8abec84d251a0 
> 3b2a389fc5746ce7ea2d59125bd02b707528ba9e 
> 1.4.2\lazarus-1.4.2-fpc-2.6.4-cross-arm-wince-win32.exe 
> fd1f7ddc01762a9c86b742c607b33319 
> 34e89dd020e302414f1aa546b4318d104fee3ed1 
> 1.4.2\w64\lazarus-1.4.2-fpc-2.6.4-cross-i386-win32-win64.exe 
> b4d4b91854915e6ca0a5772f2a27013b 
> 88b537a1ef50ae321c0323adc627cdf600e6e43f 
> 1.4.2\w64\lazarus-1.4.2-fpc-2.6.4-win64.exe

Your're right, the text is a bit messy but usable.

> Sourceforrge is (as of today) still showing the same checksums (so it 
> seems their recent downtime, has not led to modifications).
> Though of course that is, if the checksums shown today by sourceforge 
> actually matches the files online today.
> I have not downloaded todays files to check if they indeed have the 
> checksum that SF claims.

How do you manage to see checksums on Sourceforge? That would be a
start.

-- 
Marc Santhoff <M.Santhoff at web.de>





More information about the Lazarus mailing list