[Lazarus] Date value "0"
Michael Schnell
mschnell at lumino.de
Tue May 26 16:13:12 CEST 2015
On 05/26/2015 03:30 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
>
> If it were something like Anno Domini 0, which quite simply never
> existed, then it could be displayed as invalid.
>
It's funny, but AFAIK, you are right. By definition, before Year 1 there
was Year -1 and not Year 0.
Why TDateTime seemingly uses +2 = 1-1-0000 as a reference is still
another riddle.
-Michael
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list