[Lazarus] Date value "0"

Michael Schnell mschnell at lumino.de
Tue May 26 16:13:12 CEST 2015


On 05/26/2015 03:30 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
>
> If it were something like Anno Domini 0, which quite simply never 
> existed, then it could be displayed as invalid.
>
It's funny, but AFAIK, you are right. By definition, before Year 1 there 
was Year -1 and not Year 0.

Why TDateTime seemingly uses +2 = 1-1-0000 as a reference is still 
another riddle.

-Michael




More information about the Lazarus mailing list