[Lazarus] TFPWriterJPEG quality

[Norbert Crettol]

On 18/11/15 15:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> On 18/11/15 13:55, Norbert Crettol wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/15 14:38, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:22:44 -0800
>>> Aradeonas <aradeonas at operamail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maximum 100 I think.At least it is better that 75. More is better ;)
>>>
>>> If you want a lossless image, you use for example png, not jpg.
>>> (100 in jpg is still not lossless).
>>> You choose the jpg format to get a small file.
>>> 100 is definitely not the best default.
>>>
>>> Mattias
>>>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> To display my photographs on a monitor,
>> I usually use a 80% jpeg compression.
>> That's not good for printing but fair
>> enough for a computer monitor. If you
>> want a better quality, don't compress.
>>
>> Norbert
>>
>> BTW: this is my first post on this list
>>
>
> Hi Norbert,
> you're welcome,
> please note, that the netiquette of this list asks to
> preserve the order in which the messages are being answered to;
>
> (with your answer inline or under the message you are replying to).
>
> (unless you have a reason not to, e.g.
>   using a screen-reader / voice composer for visually impaired)
>
> (I let myself to rearrange this message accordingly as an example)
>
> There are numerous reasons why it is so, feel free to search the Net for 'Netiquette' ;)

Thanks for the reminder. I'll do that

Norbert