[Lazarus] LGPL versions between RTL and LCL

[Mattias Gaertner]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:18:53 +0000
C Western <l at c-m-w.me.uk> wrote:

>[...]
> My understanding was that LCL had to use the LGPL, and probably v2, as 
> it is not possible to use the LCL via dynamic linking.

It's the same for the FCL/RTL. That's why the license is "modified
LGPL2". The modification is the dyn linking exception.

> Or am I misinterpreting this?

Mattias