[Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus
Marc Santhoff
M.Santhoff at web.de
Tue Oct 13 18:25:58 CEST 2015
On Di, 2015-10-13 at 18:05 +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:56:15 +0200
> Marc Santhoff <M.Santhoff at web.de> wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > > No, "bigide" has a fixed set of components.
> >
> > Hmm, but it does build the components I have installed as an extra to
> > "naked" Lazarus. So it does more work than a vanilla installation?
>
> A "naked" Lazarus is built with "make all".
> "make bigide" contains a lot of packages. Both are fixed sets.
>
> "make useride" calls "lazbuild --buildide" which builds your own set
> of packages.
You're right, some development packages I installed temporarily are
gone. I stumbled on RTTI, but it seems to be included in the standard
set.
> >[...]
> > But the first run was Lazarus 1.4.2. Trying again using version 1.4.4
> > and including gmake clean:
> >
> > > time gmake clean bigide
> > 135.607u 11.301s 2:39.85 91.8% 2513+1182k 56+17961io 0pf+0w
> >
> > > gmake clean
> > > time gmake bigide
> > 135.717u 10.049s 2:37.20 92.7% 2537+1180k 37+11886io 0pf+0w
>
> I forgot to mention. My times were for 1.5.
Which svn revision would check out 1.5?
--
Marc Santhoff <M.Santhoff at web.de>
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list