[Lazarus] Do we really need a PaintSwastika procedure?

[Marc Santhoff]

On Fr, 2016-01-08 at 08:25 -0500, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Marc Santhoff <M.Santhoff at web.de> wrote:
> 
> > It is. I'm living in Germany, and the law forbids the use of Nazi
> > symbols. I don't know exactly, what it looks like, but there actually is
> > a clear definition how it looks like. Probably the circle around the
> > swastika and the color scheme play a role.
> >
> 
> This is some sort of odd coincidence:
> http://news.sky.com/story/1618909/hitlers-mein-kampf-on-sale-again-in-germany
> But bans are expiring.

It's in the news all day ...

The bavarian government, who owned the publishing rights, did not want
to allow re-printing. Now these rights are invalidated by german
copyright law.

The new release is a commented version, it shall be usable for teaching
because of the comments. A commission of scientists has taken three year
to make it.

OTOH the raw text is said to be downloadable from the internet very easy
ever sinc (the net exists).

But we're even further off topic now.

-- 
Marc Santhoff <M.Santhoff at web.de>