[Lazarus] Do we really need a PaintSwastika procedure?

[Shaun O'Connor]

I concur completely,  Just because a particular  graphic is included in 
the distribution densest oblige one to make use of it.

If we all got nit picky about the meaning of various symbols we would 
never get anywhere, , I say let the matter rest and concentrate on 
continuing the good work of a fine open source project.

On 08/01/2016 15:34, Donald Ziesig wrote:
> My two cents.
>
> This has gotten completely out of hand.  When an item has multiple 
> meanings (e.g., artistic, religious or offensive political history) we 
> should give it the benefit of the doubt and LEAVE IT IN.
>
> This is Lazarus (an international programming organization), not a 
> totalitarian regime.  As was exemplified before, should we paint a 
> Hindu who is printing a religious symbol with the same brush as a 
> Neo-Nazi?  I say NO.  Most people who are technically competent enough 
> to install and use Lazarus have the ability to draw anything they want 
> anyway.
>
> PLEASE, LET'S TERMINATE THIS THREAD, NOW!
>
> Don Ziesig
>
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
> .
>