[Lazarus] dynamic string proposal

[Alexey]

On 16.08.2017 12:51, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> When you propose a new string type "dynamicstring" you have to define these operators.

BTW, it will be good to have "Cstring" (or another name, not 
"dynamicstring") :

- [] operator is 0-based like Python/C

- s[i] is DWORD per char (for all Unicode chars from 0 to MaxDWORD codes)

PChar(s)/PWChar(s) wont work for it? so it is not ok idea? But this type 
can be compressed inside, eg in utf8. S[i] is DWORD outside. It is like 
some class.

-- 
Regards,
Alexey