[Lazarus] unit Masks vs. unit FPMasks
joshyfun at gmail.com
Tue Mar 2 19:18:40 CET 2021
El 02/03/2021 a las 15:22, Bart via lazarus escribió:
> First we will fork Lazarus 2.2
> Then work in mask unit can proceed.
> The advantage of this is that the new implementation is not hindered
> by the old implementation.
> So, no need to implement TMask.MatchesWindowsMask in the new implementation.
It's implemented as a new class, descendant from TMask*. Of course it
needs some unit testing.
> I did not study th enew implementation in depth, but things like
> escaping sound OK, if configurable.
It is, character and use it or not.
> Case sensitivity must be configurable, and in contrast to TMask we
> might choose to implement is as
Currently not OSDefault as for files it should be filesystem default
which is unknown (filesystem decides on each call) and for regular
strings I do not know which could be "OSDefault" :-?
> Doing it in such a way would also make adapting the TShell* controls
> easier, we can simply publish a property that controls the options for
> the mask.
No problem, you can use the code or move it to the trash bin :-)
More information about the lazarus