[lazarus] GTK or XLib or Whatever
Sergio A. Kessler
sak at perio.unlp.edu.ar
Wed Jun 30 13:17:21 EDT 1999
>> I've done something like:
>> /inc -> interfaces and multiplatform code
>> /<include your platform here>
>This is quite similar to the structure of KCL:
looks good to me ...
>> > Very intersting. IMHO the biggest problem of Lazarus is that there is
>> > too much talk and too slow progress.
>> I agree, but this come for the reasons above.
>I personally think that it is better to start with only a limited group
>of people and to add public discussions later on.
yes, yes, yes, and when you go public, have something to play,
something to hack on ...
>> and in the /long run/, when you have to do DB access, Corba access,
>> media (audio, video, etc) access, desktop access, etc
>> HOW do you do it with Gtk-only approach ? (or Qt-only ?)
>> In the long run, you will =need= Gnome or KDE, no matter what you
>> think, no matter if you like it or not.
>> So _I_ think that going with the full toolkit from the begining
>> will simplify things.
>But it will limit you in a way. BTW:
>- DB access has _nothing_ to do with desktop environments
you will ignore all the funcionality in gnome-db and kde-db ?
>- Corba support is only partly dependend on it
>- Media access is usually independent from it
same here, there is much funcionality in gnome (gnome media
framework) and kde to be ignored
>- Desktop access: Most applications won't need it
Hmmm, will see ...
>But, the main problem is, that there are at least three different groups
>- KDE fans
>- Gnome fans
>- People who won't use any of them
>I think a RAD IDE for FreePascal is _extremely_ important, especially
>under Linux; and if you choose to support *only* KDE *or* Gnome you can
>be sure to have about 2/3 of the people against you.
how about Gnome _and_ Kde _and_ Gtk-only _and_ Motif, etc ?
anyway, I think you have a winner where this thinghs can be
reality, don't go public before things are cemented and you
know exactly what you want.
More information about the Lazarus