[lazarus] Client area under win32
smiller1 at stvgb.org
Mon Sep 16 11:30:43 EDT 2002
I agree that these emails (win32 related) should be on our developers
mailing. If possible, when you are creating them, add [win32] to the
subject just like the [lazarus] appears here. It'll help those on the
development list that are not interested in the win32 stuff to sort
through the emails.
Michael, it's only been 3 1/2 years? It seems longer. :-)
From: Michael A. Hess [mailto:mhess at miraclec.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:19 AM
To: lazarus at miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Client area under win32
Gerry Ferdinandus wrote:
> Thank you for showing interest in win32 interface.
My comments are a follow up to the comments from Mattias.
> I am studying the win32 interface code to see what is the best
> to finish the job.
> The best approach is I thing to finish it at 'message' level one by
> For example:
> Finish LM_CREATE for all components + testing.
> Finish LM_DESTROY for all components + testing.
> Finish LM_SHOWHIDE for all components + testing.
> And not 'jumping' from one bug fix to another bug fix.
> With this approach is too difficult to organize the 'work'.
> And there is the possibility of to much method/event that's not
> implemented with the above 'jumping' approach.
I have to agree with Mattias. This approach might have worked about
three years ago when we started but with the current complexity and
interrelationship of the code it is unlikely to work well.
> At this moment there are no win32 team group.
> You can send E-Mail directly to me for offline 'work' discussions.
> And team up with me?
It is great if you can put together a team of developers to work on the
Win32 interface but we would rather you stay involved with the
developers as a whole. We have another mailing list which is used just
by the core developers. If you do get a team together and start doing
work and want to commit changes to the project we will include you in
this list and give you access to CVS. If required, I can also setup
another win32 developer specific mailing list but please try to keep
your conversations include with the rest of the developers so that we
can all play a part.
Some of us (such as myself) have been working on this project now for
over 3 1/2 years so we have a pretty good idea of the problems and
> I personally think that LCL + (GTK/Win32) interface should have the
> behaviour as VCL and/or CLX.
> This is to avoid long discussions.
> If the GTK interface is not VCL/CLX compatible then the GTK team
> fix it if possible.
As Mattias mentioned, the LCL is a work alike. We decided a LONG time
ago that the LCL would work like the VCL and be very, very, very similar
but would never be able to totally port Delphi code. At that time Kylix
didn't even exist so no plans for CLX intergration was even possible.
Lazarus is not suppose to be a Delphi clone. It is a Delphi work alike.
It will/is able to import existing DFM files and standard non-component
code with little changes. However, anything component specific is
expected to require some tweeking.
We are trying to design the LCL to use the best capabilities that the
API has to offer. Just because the VCL does it one way doesn't necessary
mean that it is the best way. :-)
That being said if there is something you guys find that would work
better if the GTK interface changed then by all means lets do that. That
is the reason why it is best if all developers are talking together on
the same mailing list.
And above all, have fun working on it. :-)
==== Programming my first best destiny! ====
Michael A. Hess Miracle Concepts, Inc.
mhess at miraclec.com http://www.miraclec.com
To unsubscribe: mail lazarus-request at miraclec.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
More information about the Lazarus