[Lazarus] update [Re: Code Folding mess and Code Divider feature]

[Alexander Klenin]

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:56, Martin Friebe <lazarus at mfriebe.de> wrote:

>> Sorry, no patch from me, but I can create an issue if you want.
>> I have no problems with a separate page,
>> but why do you reject a common list? It seems the best solution to me.
>>
> Dividers initially could only be set at places where a fold ended. Now
> they can be set at places, even if the place is not configured as the
> end of a fold. So they are a separate feature.
> Divider-Locations also is a different list than Fold-Locations, so
> sharing the same list, would be confusing.

Well, there are already two divider sub-kinds -- nested and normal ones.
They already display different controls (spin editor vs checkbox,
second color picker).
I suggest to add 'Fold' checkbox, in the same vein -- it will be displayed
only for foldable locations.

>> BTW, don't you think that per-type divider coloring is an overkill?
>> Perhaps a single color on Colors page would be sufficient?
>>
> Not necessarily.
> For Example (I use this) I have a normal grey (same as right/80-column
> border) for procedures (procedures at top-level.
> But I use a lighter grey for nested procedures. So I can see the
> difference between nested and top level procs.

No problem, but how do I globally change divider color then?
Do I have to change it for every kind of location?

-- 
Alexander S. Klenin