[Lazarus] Release 1.0, part 2

Graeme Geldenhuys graeme at mastermaths.co.za
Wed Dec 2 08:20:04 CET 2009


Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> 
> For example: eight years ago the specification for 1.0 would be
> something like this:
> - half the debugger that we have now
> - 30 controls on windows + linux with half the properties we have now
> - some IDE features
> 
> In other words: Lazarus is already far beyond that.

Finally, one of the core Lazarus developer that agree with what I said!!

The 1.0 release is being pushed back more and more by new features (in
my studies it was called "creeping requirements" and is the bane of all
software projects). There never seems to be a feature freeze. And you
agree too that Lazarus is far beyond the initial 1.0 release
specification, so why then isn't Lazarus at v1.0 yet?

I'm simply trying to help the Lazarus project, by preventing more and
more bad press. Even if that means playing the "marketing game". Bad
comments, bad press, FUD, etc.... they all scare developers away. I'm
trying to do a good thing here, but it seems like all the core Lazarus
developers have a mental block against anything I say. I simply don't
get it! Why have a project that you don't want anybody else to use???

Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/





More information about the Lazarus mailing list