[Lazarus] DCPCrypt is updated. Now what?

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

> [our company is experiencing SMTP problems with our ISP, so excuse any
> duplicate emails from me]
>
> 2009/11/16 Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org>:
>>
>> If DPCrypt's license matches the FCL one, I see no reason not to
>> include it.
>
>
> It is already ok I think (MIT/BSD license without advocacy clause). From
> previous discussions in fpc-pascal mailing list, Marco said this will be
> fine for FCL.
>

Really ? I am not so sure about this.

This should be taken up first prior to continuing.

Michael.