[Lazarus] Lazarus FPC 2.5.1
Justin Smyth
delphian at smythconsulting.net
Fri Apr 9 13:02:02 CEST 2010
Flávio
I'll continue to look & search , i've been successfull in rebuilding the FPC
( we i assume so , the source file in the source directory of the FPC has
been changed and i can see that the new fpc.exe has been build so one would
assume that part is done )
Its on a windows box i'm doing this not Linux ( theres no linux counterpart
for ipersist as this is microsoft com object for windows).
I'm only asking on this thread since i'm sure the update for executable for
fpc is ok ( i move it into my lazarus fpc directory where it exists - only
the executable )
Its the rebuilding of using make for lazarus i'm not sure about , i'm
following some directions i've been given but lazarus acts like the change
in the RTL hasnt been done.
Maybe i'm doing something wrong , in getting the updated fpc ? thats why i
am asking ...
Delphian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Flávio Etrusco" <flavio.etrusco at gmail.com>
To: "Justin Smyth" <delphian at smythconsulting.net>; "Lazarus mailing list"
<lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus FPC 2.5.1
This has been asked (and answered) on the list a few times.
If you're using Linux I have a sample script ;) Otherwise, you may
look at the FPC build FAQ (manual?) or google for the previous
messages.
Also, you may have better luck asking in the FPC-devel list about the
GetClassID bug.
Best regards,
Flávio
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Justin Smyth
<delphian at smythconsulting.net> wrote:
> Guys
>
> I need to make a few small changes to the RTL in FPC 2.5.1 and recompile
> lazarus with these updates , i've been able to re complile FPC 2.5.1 ok
> but
> lazarus acts like it doesnt know about the changes. the unit i am changing
> is activex.pp - i've found a bug and its a show stopper for one of my
> apps.(
> the bug is GetClassID in Ipersist , it should be defined with out in the
> param list )
>
>
> Delphian
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kjow" <antispammoni at gmail.com>
> To: "Lazarus mailing list" <lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 7:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Lazarus] FPC 2.4.0 vs 2.5.1
>
>
>> 2010/4/9 Michael Van Canneyt <michael at freepascal.org>:
>>>
>>> There are too many to say. 2.5.1 is a development version, and
>>> can in theory be very unstable.
>>
>> Umm.. what I mean is that FPC 2.5.1 has only more functions or if it
>> generates code more speeder, etc... so something in general :)
>>
>>> I would recommend 2.4.0
>>>
>>> If you want to develop for arm, maybe you can request merging of some
>>> arm-related fixes from 2.5.1 to 2.4.0.
>>
>> Ok, at moment I'm using 2.5.1 only, so I can make two different
>> config: a general purpose with 2.4.0 (major project/pc) and an arm
>> specific platform with 2.5.1 (arm device only).
>>
>> Thank you very much, Michael!
>> Best Regards,
>> Kjow
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lazarus mailing list
>> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
>> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list