[Lazarus] Code refused from Andreas Hausladen? Is this true?

[Marco van de Voort]

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:41:05PM +0200, J?rgen Hestermann wrote:
> > Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
> > Yes, sure. I remember that some years ago it was claiming that Lazarus
> > developers were rude to him. But I searched the Lazarus mailling lists
> > archives and I found it to be a complete lie, which shows a total lack
> > of ethics by who claimed it.
> 
> I don't know this special case but it sounded a bit familiar to me. I also
> found that some of the main contributors to Lazarus behave quite rude from
> time to time (maybe they don't even notice theirself anymore).  Some
> behave like censors (not like moderators of a an open source platform),
> oppressing mails because they dislike them.

Relegating threads that are not focussed on improving FPC/Lazarus anymore to
fpc-other is IMHO perfectly fine behaviour.

It's the same patter as elsewhere in this thread. People with rejected
patches, and more often "ideas" how it "should" be tend to discuss
incessantly just to make their point.

But if the majority (if not all) developers already discounted it, the
thread is no longer about improving fpc/lazarus, and thus offtopic on the
main maillists. The fact that FPC even provides room (fpc-other) for such
discussions to continue is IMHO already the contradiction to the fact that
this is about censoring of unwanted ideas.