[Lazarus] TCustomComboBox.ArrowKeysTraverseList mistery

[Mattias Gaertner]

Em 15-05-2010 05:35, Graeme Geldenhuys escreveu:
> You totally misread my post. I wasn't talking about abandoning GTK (v1
> & v2), only GTK1 because it's often broken and nobody reports issues -
> probably because nobody really uses it any more. And as for LCL-GTK2,
> Lazarus really should try and keep up with the GTK2 development. GTK2
> is already at 2.30 and LCL-GTK2 still says we only support from GTK
> 2.4/2.6 yet all modern distros ship with GTK 2.16+ at least.  If that
> same design idea was applied to LCL-QT, then LCL-QT would currently
> only support Qt v2 features.
> 
> I really don't seem to understand the Lazarus team's thinking. We will
> continue support GTK1 even though no modern Linux distro comes
> standard with GTK1 anymore. LCL-Qt is immediately bumped up to the
> latest Qt v4 version. But no, LCL-GTK2 is in some limbo land. Not
> stable, and not keeping current with the latest GTK2. Yet this is all
> ok to the Lazarus team. Maybe I'm just used to working in a
> development team that is a lot more organized and has a clear
> direction. Enough said on this topic already so I'll stop here.

I have not addressed version of GTK, I quoted the GTK. ;)
For me the gtk1 was no longer more alive, he's ugly and reminds me of
Win95. :P

> I don't, that's the point. If I see something wrong, I report it (I
> already reported 200+ bugs in Lazarus alone and supply patches where I
> can). The Lazarus team keeps saying that if something is not reported,
> they will not know it's broken. If it's not a code issue, I try and
> contribute by give alternative advice. Either way, this always seems
> to land me in hot water for some reason. There seems to be no win-win
> situation here.

I could not translate that part, and I think you not understand well my
message (or I do not translate well). :/

-- 
Silvio Clecio
$ programmer ObjectPascal - <http://silvioprog.com.br>
$ Nosso canal IRC sobre FPC-Lazarus - #lazarus-br