[Lazarus] [OT] About licences

[Marco van de Voort]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
> 
> Where does it say that? By "LGPL with exception", I gather you mean like 
> the license used by FPC? It that case, there is only a "static linking 
> exception". You are still required to donate all modifications to the 
> LGPL code though, just like the vanilla LGPL license.

My bad, you are entirely right. The exception absloves you from the clause
that forces dynlinking, not the OSS bits. I don't know what I was thinking.