[Lazarus] [OT] About licences

Zaher Dirkey parmaja at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 14:18:52 CEST 2011


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marco van de Voort <marcov at stack.nl>wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > > The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
> >
> > Where does it say that? By "LGPL with exception", I gather you mean like
> > the license used by FPC? It that case, there is only a "static linking
> > exception". You are still required to donate all modifications to the
> > LGPL code though, just like the vanilla LGPL license.
>
> My bad, you are entirely right. The exception absloves you from the clause
> that forces dynlinking, not the OSS bits. I don't know what I was thinking.
>
>
I always feel not free with all this free licenses.

Regards

-- 
Zaher Dirkey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20110330/c165502d/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Lazarus mailing list