[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0 is branched

[Marcos Douglas]

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner
<nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:59:08 -0300
> Marcos Douglas <md at delfire.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Mattias Gaertner
>> <nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:38:03 -0300
>> > Marcos Douglas <md at delfire.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>[...]
>> >> I can't use "make all" because all configuration, components, etc will gone.
>> >
>> > No. Make does not delete/alter configurations.
>> > In fact it does not even know where your configuration is.
>> > That's why it can only build a default IDE or a default big IDE.
>> >
>> > When you start such a default IDE, it will read your configuration. If
>> > you use it to build a new IDE it will install your packages. Then you
>> > get a new IDE with your configuration and your components.
>> >
>> > Or you can use lazbuild to build an IDE with your components in a
>> > console.
>>
>> Sorry, I think I did not understand. You're saying I should use Make
>> to build a default IDE at the first time. After that I should use the
>> Build command (on IDE) or lazbuild tool to recompile with my own
>> configurations and components?
>
> "make clean all" is the clean way.

It's recommended if I have an error, right?
We use "make clean all", get a default IDE and recompile again using
pcp param to restart all configurations, components, etc. But I have
to compile twice. Am I right?

> In 99,9% of all svn revisions it is enough to rebuild the IDE via the
> IDE.

OK.
I compiled project ide/startlazarus.lpi and I got an error because the
startlazarus.exe is running... of course. So, I started Lazarus
without use startlazarus and I compiled again. Now I can see the
splash updated.

Marcos Douglas