[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0 is branched
waldo kitty
wkitty42 at windstream.net
Thu Apr 5 04:17:15 CEST 2012
On 4/4/2012 21:18, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>> "make clean all" is the clean way.
>
> It's recommended if I have an error, right?
ummm... noooo... please see the "lazbuild build IDE profiles" thread...
> We use "make clean all", get a default IDE and recompile again using
> pcp param to restart all configurations, components, etc. But I have
> to compile twice. Am I right?
yes, there is that but if "make all" is not used, the one must know and call all
of the necessary make targets without the IDE one to get all the tools built...
>> In 99,9% of all svn revisions it is enough to rebuild the IDE via the
>> IDE.
that's what my discussions in the "lazbuild build IDE profiles" thread are all
about... why have to manually go into the IDE to build a new IDE after a svn
update?? i start my "updatelaz" script which cleans the dirs, updates from svn,
and then does the building of the tools and lazarus... now that things are
working better, i can go have a cuppa' joe while everything does all its
churning and burning... on this particular workstation, that's about 30 minutes
or so... maybe more... maybe less...
> OK.
> I compiled project ide/startlazarus.lpi and I got an error because the
> startlazarus.exe is running... of course. So, I started Lazarus
> without use startlazarus and I compiled again. Now I can see the
> splash updated.
hummm... interesting...
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list