[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.0 is branched

[Marcos Douglas]

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:33 PM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 at windstream.net> wrote:
> On 4/5/2012 14:54, waldo kitty wrote:
>>
>> On 4/5/2012 12:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>>
>>> In another words, if I used lazbuild I had compile just one time. Is
>>> that you mean?
>
> [...]
>
>> so a whole new svn install can go like this...
>>
>> 1- get the sources from SVN /branches/fixes_1_0/
>> 2- make lazbuild lcl ideintf components tools starter
>> 3- lazbuild --build-ide= --build-mode=
>> 4. copy lazarus.new.exe lazarus.exe (i don't know why lazbuild doesn't,
>> yet)
>>
> [trim]
>
>> whereas an update would be like so...
>>
>> 1- make clean
>> 2- svn up
>> 3- make lazbuild lcl ideintf components tools starter
>> 4- lazbuild --build-ide= --build-mode=
>> 5. copy lazarus.new.exe lazarus.exe (i don't know why lazbuild doesn't,
>> yet)
>
>
> yes! i can confirm that the update workflow (above) works without building a
> new ide first and then building another one with lazbuild... this definitely
> saves some time ;)
>
> i will assume that the new load from svn workflow (also above) works without
> building an ide and then another with lazbuild... i will try to incorporate
> this into my copy of the wiki instruction scripts and see how it goes...
>
> it is actually easier than i thought and i would never have gotten this far
> without the help and explanations from mattias and others who tossed in
> nuggets here and there...

Very nice.
I have one question:
If you use "make lcl ideintf components [...]" and after "lazbuild
[...]" you probably compiled the same sources twice (first with Make
and then using lazbuild), don't?

Marcos Douglas