[Lazarus] Beyond Compare 4 built with Lazarus 1.2
Marcos Douglas
md at delfire.net
Sat Dec 28 14:51:55 CET 2013
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
<michael at freepascal.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>>> That said:
>>> Nothing stops anyone from implementing a totally separate RTL for FPC.
>>>
>>> The number of internal functions that must be implemented for the
>>> compiler
>>> to be able to function is rather limited.
>>>
>>> If you check the archives, you'll notice that I have often recommended
>>> people to do so.
>>
>>
>> So you do that, ie, make your own RTL? The major problem is work on
>> Windows and I don't know if you work it.
>
>
> Why would I ? I don't need it.
>
> Frankly, I don't understand what all the fuss is about.
> Everything is perfectly clear to me, I know how to deal with issues, if they
> pop up.
So PLEASE, tell us how to make a code on Windows safe, readable and
strong using FPC 2.6.x (AnsiString) and Lazarus (UTF-8) because I and
most people still not know.
> Yes, 2.8 or 3.0 will be a big change. They will include a unicode RTL
> somehow.
Yes. So, how I can protect my code TODAY to the uncertain future?
> If you work with 2.6.X, there is no problem to understand the RTL:
> everything is ansistring: Single byte string, system codepage.
I do not have problems to understand that.
> All the rest is either
> - People who don't grasp the consequences of the above simple sentence.
> - People spreading FUD.
>
> And yes, I realize that if you really, really need unicode with 2.6.x, you
> have a problem with the current RTL. No-one ever denied this.
> At least, the Lazarus team tried to give a workaround with their UTF-8
> functions.
Yes, yes. I'm not here to complain. I'm here to understand how I can
solve my problems and, at the same time, help other people. I'm not
doing FUD.
My questions are simple:
1. How can I make programs on Windows using FPC and Lazarus without
problems with Unicode stuff?
2. What I can do now to protect my code for the new FPC
implementations on the future?
> The FPC team is working on a more fundamental solution. So either be
> patient, or contact me for instructions on how you can help.
I will be patient... but tell me how I can help anyway.
>
> But please, Please, PLEASE stop these pointless discussions.
Sorry man, but other people have the same problems. That is real.
Thanks, anyway. Peace.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list