[Lazarus] The future of desktop
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk
Fri Nov 29 12:53:15 CET 2013
Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 11:55 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> That goes back to some of the earliest Netscape versions, IIRC it was
>> originally used to update images periodically. While attractive, this
>> sort of thing can turn into a nightmare if the browser on an end
>> user's system leaks memory until an entire page (i.e. not just part of
>> the DOM describing the page) is forcibly reloaded- BTDT.
>
> Do we still need to take into account that a browser is that limited ?
> Browser technology has advanced a lot during the passed few years.
"Do we have to take into account that a browser might have bugs?"
Probably.
"Do we have to take into account that somebody might run a browser older
than we like supporting?"
Partly: at the absolute minimum to give him a sensible error message,
and ideally to provide some sort of usable UI even if it lacks the
"bells and whistles".
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list