[Lazarus] Need testers for the a new debugger

Dmitry Boyarintsev skalogryz.lists at gmail.com
Mon Aug 25 14:02:00 CEST 2014


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:26 AM, C Western <l at c-m-w.me.uk> wrote:

>
> 1. How about a "slow step" option?
>
What's is slow step option? Is it stepping over each instruction until the
next known line reached?

2. Could the compiler add more information to make this easier? Or is it
> simply a matter of compiling everything with a stack frame?
>
How about using a 3d party library compiled without debugging info / stack
frame?
The library could use your code compiled with debug info (i.e. by calling a
callback), where the debugger should stop.

thanks,
Dmirty
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20140825/8a67ca38/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Lazarus mailing list