[Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Tue Jul 1 09:36:04 CEST 2014
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 06/30/2014 07:53 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>> In hobby projects that might be fine, but in commercial multi-platform apps
>> that is unacceptable.
> I see.
>
> Regarding myself, I in fact don't like taking the enhanced effort of
> beatifying the GUI (and Delphi-introduced Windows Widget Set compatibility)
> in consideration too much. For me GUI is just a necessary must to allow for
> user interaction and should be as restricted and efficient as possible. Hence
> even the offering of the LCL seems bloated to me and I would not mind
> restricting it to commonly usable widgets.
You obviously don't often get in contact with clients and marketeers.
While I agree with your concept, in practice, the UI must be as bloated as possible,
showing as much as possible info, and preferably as 'hip' as possible
(whatever hip means on that particular instant and place).
Michael.
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list