[Lazarus] CHM help age and readmechm.txt in a fresh installation

[Kostas Michalopoulos]

Which is why i'm asking, shouldn't those be generated automatically for
each build? Make it part of the build process, i mean, so there wont be a
need to do it manually, have a change to make a mistake or forget some case
(like the one with Windows - FWIW mine also mention at the bottom that they
were generated on 2 August 2012 and the files have that date) and people
who build Lazarus from source will have them out of the box and up to date.
AFAIK all the files are there anyway, what is stopping it becoming part of
the build?


On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Mattias Gaertner <nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:37:31 +0100
> Andreas Frieß <friess at gmx.at> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote:
> > >> Shouldn't the CHM files be (re)generated when a full build is made?
> > > FPC chm's are generated on every RC and final build. Last is for 2.6.4
> and
> > > can be found in the doc dir of FPC, dated 2014-02-25
> > >
> > I see. But in the actual Lazarus (Install for Windows) the chm's are
> > from 24.8.2012. I think something was going wrong.
>
> The rpms, debs, dmg and zips have chms from September 2013.
>
> Mattias
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20150121/9d66bb56/attachment-0003.html>