[Lazarus] String vs WideString

[Michael Schnell]

On 15.08.2017 11:15, Tony Whyman via Lazarus wrote:
> Why shouldn't there be a single char type that intuitively represents 
> a single character regardless of how many bytes are used to represent it.

I suppose by "char" you mean "single printable thingy" with Unicode it's 
rather debatable what such a thingy is.

Hence a Unicode singe char would need to be just be a Unicode string.

-Michael