[Lazarus] String vs WideString
Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Tue Aug 15 14:53:00 CEST 2017
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:26:34 +0200
Michael Schnell via Lazarus <lazarus at lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> On 15.08.2017 11:15, Tony Whyman via Lazarus wrote:
> > Why shouldn't there be a single char type that intuitively represents
> > a single character regardless of how many bytes are used to represent it.
>
> I suppose by "char" you mean "single printable thingy" with Unicode it's
> rather debatable what such a thingy is.
>
> Hence a Unicode singe char would need to be just be a Unicode string.
Do you mean a 'char' is a string in your proposal?
Mattias
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list