[Qt] Serious problems with libqt4intf quality for Debian
Marcin Dębicki
alterfenix at gmail.com
Sat Dec 19 04:11:23 CET 2009
Agreed. Such thing would be welcomed on Windows. On Linux Qt comes
with system anyway (usually). on Windows it doesn't. And atm simple
Lazarus application compiled with Qt requires some set of Qt dlls
Best regards
Marcin Dębicki
2009/12/17 zeljko <zeljko at holobit.net>:
> On Thursday 17 December 2009 11:47, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>> Hello Den,
>>
>> Since you are working on this, what about splitting the bindings?
>>
>> Currently LCL-Qt applications need QWebPage, QNetworkXXX, etc, which
>> are not used by it.
>>
>> A simple split in 2 parts, one with some basic packages which LCL uses
>> and another with extra packages would solve the problem.
>
> I cannot agree with such splitting - it's just workaround.
> If there's a need to split qt bindings, then it should be splitted in manner
> of qt libs.
> 1.qtcore (so it can be used for console apps only)
> 2.qtgui (gui components)
> 3.qtnetwork (network components)
> 4.qtwebkit (webkit)
>
> In this case lcl-qt should use qtcore + qtgui
>
> zeljko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt mailing list
> Qt at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/qt
>
More information about the Qt
mailing list