[Qt] LCLQt vs LCLQt5
Juha Manninen
juha.manninen62 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 24 13:36:15 CEST 2017
21.7.2017 10.57 "Heiko Tietze via Qt" <qt at lists.lazarus-ide.org> kirjoitti:
But I wonder if we better keep LCLQt for all Qt variants and introduce a
'legacy' LCLQt4 switch additional to the new LCLQt5.
+1
It would make things easier. QT 4 and 5 are so similar that a common define
could be used in most places.
Juha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/qt/attachments/20170724/426045f3/attachment.html>
More information about the Qt
mailing list