[Lazarus] Building Lazarus on Mac OS 10.5 Leopard
konf at rotursoft.sk
Fri Jul 18 15:12:12 CEST 2008
I feel, that Carbon's IDE is not very stabile, but I feel the same
with GTK2 on Linux too. I worked in first step of porting in Windows'
Lazarus and there it was quite good with stability. I don't say it was
perfect, but basically I've got our application working on Win32.
Anyway Freepascal/Lazarus project did/still doing a lot to get very
useful independent developer environment.
<<< 18.7.2008 14:23 - Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho "felipemonteiro.carvalho at gmail.com" >>>
FMdC> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Roland Turcan <konf at rotursoft.sk> wrote:
>> Of course, I would like to prefer Carbon on Mac, but somewhere I've
>> seen information, that IDE with GTK is more stable on Mac than
>> Carbon's one. Maybe it is older information.
>> What are your experiences with Carbon IDE?
FMdC> Well, I disagree with Mattias here. I only use the Carbon IDE since
FMdC> some months, and Carbon is already the default widgetset in Mac OS X
FMdC> and it was already decided that the next release will be based in it.
FMdC> I think it will depend on which features you need. Some bugs in the
FMdC> Gtk IDE make it almost useless for me, like copy+paste not working
FMdC> with other applications. If you don't need the same set of features as
FMdC> I do, then the Gtk IDE may be better.
Best regards, TRoland
More information about the Lazarus