[Lazarus] revision numbers of each SVN tag?

Hans-Peter Diettrich DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
Tue Apr 14 12:35:40 CEST 2009

Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:

>> Yes, but beware the some of them got merges from trunk afterwards.
>> For instance, lazarus_0_9_26_2 is based on 18716, and r18269 got merged
>>  resulting in r18898. So you cannot simpy use r18898 for the tag.
> I noticed that...  Doesn't that defeat the point of tags???  Branches
> are used for merging things. Tags should be set in stone - a snapshot
> at a specific point in time.

I'll second that.

Later fixes should be supplied as patches (AKA "service packs"), IMO.


More information about the Lazarus mailing list