[Lazarus] Lazarus and bigide
Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Fri Oct 1 16:43:24 CEST 2010
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:43:55 +0000
Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
> Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> > Zitat von Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl.lazarus at telemetry.co.uk>:
> >
> >> I've got Lazarus installed on a number of systems, and in some cases
> >> (when I last checked) I could only build the standard IDE- not the
> >> bigide additions.
> >
> > What is the problem? Any error message?
> > What system (os, lazarus, fpc version)?
>
> I'd have to check, and I'd rather not get too embroiled in that today.
> Working from memory, something like Linux on SPARC, 0.9.26, 2.2.4 and
> problems with libc when when making with bigide.
I'm not sure if bigide was properly tested on sparc.
> >> If I want to move a project between development systems, some of which
> >> might have bigide and others not, is best practice to avoid using
> >> components which appear on the bigide pages of the palette (i.e. to
> >> create objects at run time rather than at design time)?
> >
> > The bigide components are the most stable. There should be no problem to
> > install them.
>
> I'd be very happy to run a Lazarus make with bigide on the various Linux
> systems (x86, SPARC, PPC and ARM) I've got here and report back, but I
> suspect that that could uncover subsidiary issues that wouldn't be
> entirely welcome :-/ It would also be fairly slow, since some of these
> aren't exactly top specification.
As the lazarus developers have only spare access to sparc, arm and
powerpc I beg you tell what runs and what not, so we can setup the right
bigide package set for those platforms.
> Which is why, if there's any doubt at all, I'd far prefer to simply
> avoid design-time initialisation of suspect components.
Mattias
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list