[Lazarus] Is win32 svn broken?

[Lukasz Sokol]

On 14/10/2011 09:07, Gregory M. Turner wrote:

> Not that I fault anybody for using it -- I use it internally, in 
> fact.  But,... come now... one monolithic linear repository relying 
> on a _convention_ of "branch" _directories_?  Each repo hosted at a 
> canonical url, which we need constant access to in order to get 
> anything done?  A self-described "better cvs"?  It really is quite 
> regressive.
> 
> -gmt
> 

Quoting Linus Torvalds (from wikipedia)
The slogan of Subversion for a while was "CVS done right", or something 
like that, and if you start with that kind of slogan, there's nowhere 
you can go. There is no way to do CVS right

L.