[Lazarus] Embarcadero vs Lazarus/FPC (Oracle vs Google)
Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.lists at gmail.com
Tue May 8 14:31:02 CEST 2012
On 8 May 2012 14:07, Andrew Brunner <andrew.t.brunner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oracle is telling google that that it is UNACCEPTABLE for google to take
> creative ownership over Java. This problem goes far beyond copying of some
> API. Google as made and Oracle product - and Oracle is not happy.
This applies exactly to FPC and Lazarus as far as I can see.
Borland/Embarcadero created a product (eg: like Sun/Oracle did with
Java), then came the community and made a new competing product -
based on the API of Borland/Embarcadero (like Google did).
> Recent versions of Delphi come with some parts FPC or Lazarus, this fact
> alone says signals their acceptance of FPC and Lazarus.
I may be wrong, but as far as I know Delphi XE2 only uses FPC for
compiling ARM/iOS executables. Delphi XE2 doesn't use anything of
Lazarus.
> Lastly, API stands for Application Programming Interface. So in order to
> Interface with an API, both sides of the code MUST be identical.
FPC and Lazarus are not interfacing with Delphi, they are cloning
Delphi functionality and API [with some minor tweaks of there own],
and making a competing product. As far as I can see, this is exactly
what Google did with Java - and Oracle is not happy with this. In a
similar situation Microsoft tried this before [with Java] and Sun won
the case there.
At the moment anyway, it seems that if you are a developer in Europe,
you are still safe to use FPC and Lazarus (as Žilvinas quoted link
shows). But for anybody else, this is a bit worrisome. :-( I guess we
will just have to wait and see what the judge decides.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
More information about the Lazarus
mailing list